From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946088AbXDEIPk (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:15:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946093AbXDEIPk (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:15:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:42068 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946088AbXDEIPg (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:15:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge X-Fcc: ~/Mail/linus Cc: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, lkml , Zachary Amsden , Jan Beulich , "Eric W. Biederman" , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Relocate VDSO ELF headers to match mapped location with COMPAT_VDSO In-Reply-To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge's message of Wednesday, 4 April 2007 23:46:29 -0700 <46149B45.2070502@goop.org> X-Shopping-List: (1) Economical wavechord ghost-melts (2) Fluent thieving aluminum hatred (3) Curious robbers (4) Medical metronome effluents Message-Id: <20070405081432.4CB82180055@magilla.sf.frob.com> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 01:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I did the second patch because I could, and to see if it would provoke > some comment. But effectively removing a kernel config option seems > like a good idea to me. Well, it provoked me to care whether the first patch the relocation "really right". Thanks, Roland