From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753306AbXDERGs (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:06:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753313AbXDERGs (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:06:48 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.153]:56436 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753306AbXDERGr (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:06:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 22:44:13 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: "Paul Menage" Cc: sekharan@us.ibm.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xemul@sw.ru, rohitseth@google.com, pj@sgi.com, "Eric W. Biederman" , mbligh@google.com, winget@google.com, containers@lists.osdl.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" , dev@sw.ru, devel@openvz.org Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem Message-ID: <20070405171413.GK28414@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@in.ibm.com References: <6599ad830704031030n2311bcd7hca9f34e64c66337f@mail.gmail.com> <20070403175101.GN2456@in.ibm.com> <6599ad830704031049v7fad0a83q3c24211cf44d71d6@mail.gmail.com> <20070404030756.GA9008@in.ibm.com> <6599ad830704032104hda0c4bu7099c23a86940c76@mail.gmail.com> <20070404051526.GA16562@in.ibm.com> <6599ad830704040000of7f1197ica543e14d290509e@mail.gmail.com> <20070404172643.GA28328@in.ibm.com> <6599ad830704041157m22f62077tbc41dbc064385838@mail.gmail.com> <20070405165752.GA13687@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070405165752.GA13687@in.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 10:27:52PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > Ok ..by posting rcfs patches, I didn't mean to introduce a "yours" and > "mine" rift ..honestly. In fact you would notice that they have your > (sole) copyright still on them! It took me just two days to convert over the > patches to use nsproxy and come up with the rcfs patches and obviously I > couldnt have done that without your excellent patches to start with. By doing rcfs, I have been able to do a much better review of your patches than by just browsing thr' the code. I hope you would find usefull some of the feedback I have sent so far on the container patches .. -- Regards, vatsa