From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/7] [RFC] Battery monitoring class
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:51:28 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070413135128.GA17921@khazad-dum.debian.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070413023659.GA17467@zarina>
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > With fixed-units files, having *_energy and *_capacity isn't too clear
> > either... Nor is it consistent with SBS, since SBS uses "capacity" to
> > refer to either energy or charge, depending on a units attribute.
> >
> > As a compromise, how about using "energy" and "charge" for quantities,
> > and "charging" (i.e., a verb) when referring to the operation?
>
> It would be great compromise! Please please please!
I can live with it, although I'd rather just use the units (zero margin of
error or confusion).
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-13 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-11 23:25 Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-12 2:53 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-04-12 16:51 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-12 3:43 ` Greg KH
2007-04-12 12:25 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-04-12 13:43 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-12 13:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-04-12 14:15 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-12 14:24 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-04-12 14:36 ` [Kernel-discuss] " Paul Sokolovsky
2007-04-12 18:56 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-04-12 20:44 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-13 0:51 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-04-13 2:15 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-24 19:36 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-13 2:34 ` Shem Multinymous
2007-04-13 2:36 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-13 13:51 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [this message]
2007-04-12 15:00 ` Shem Multinymous
2007-04-12 15:18 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-12 17:23 ` Shem Multinymous
2007-04-13 13:49 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-15 0:43 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-05-04 9:59 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-15 19:56 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-15 22:10 ` [Kernel-discuss] " Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-15 22:08 ` Ondrej Zajicek
2007-04-15 22:50 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-16 0:57 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-04-16 1:57 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-16 14:34 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-04-16 2:32 ` [Kernel-discuss] " ian
2007-04-16 3:12 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-04-16 8:28 ` ian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070413135128.GA17921@khazad-dum.debian.net \
--to=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®