From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752141AbXDNUfN (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:35:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752209AbXDNUfN (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:35:13 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:51803 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752141AbXDNUfL (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:35:11 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc6 Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:38:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Tobias Diedrich , Linux Kernel Mailing List , pavel@suse.cz, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Maxim Levitsky References: <200704142223.32410.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070414202527.GH3691@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20070414202527.GH3691@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704142238.44184.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday, 14 April 2007 22:25, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:23:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >... > > Also, would that be feasible for you to use 'shutdown' as a workaround in case > > the source of the problem is difficult to find and/or fix? > > One person reporting a regression against a -rc kernel can mean > houndreds or thousands of people who will run into the same issue after > 2.6.21 got released if a manual workaround is required... Well, in this particular case it is not very likely to happen. I have three x86_64 machines here with totally different chipsets/devices on which I'm not seeing anything like that and I believe we'd have more reports before if that were a common issue. That said, I'm not going to ignore it. I'll do my best to debug and fix it, if Tobias helps me. :-) Greetings, Rafael