mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
Subject: Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:29:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070416062921.GB7528@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070416011636.GO3691@stusta.de>

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:16:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 > On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:54:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:37:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 > > 
 > >  > Subject    : ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works  (PCI related?)
 > >  >              workaround: booting with "hpet=disable"
 > >  > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/3
 > >  > Submitter  : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
 > >  >              Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
 > >  > Caused-By  : PCI merge
 > >  >              commit 78149df6d565c36675463352d0bfe0000b02b7a7
 > >  > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
 > >  >              Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
 > >  > Status     : unknown
 > > 
 > > note that this workaround doesn't seem to work in all cases.
 > > Mine may a slightly different model (I have the tablet version)
 > > but disabling hpet shows the same regression.
 > > I've been fighting Eric's USB debug cable code in the hope
 > > of getting _something_ useful out of it other than a black screen,
 > > but I've been getting nowhere with it.
 > 
 > I'm not sure why I thought you two ran into the same regression.

I'm not sure why I never hit the same bug that Jeremy did
(again, maybe subtle hardware differences between our models),
but I finally got somewhere.   -rc7 with the same config I've
been testing exhibited exactly the same bug.   Disabling
the FB_BACKLIGHT option (and all the FB drivers that 'select' it),
I get a working display on resume again.

This makes a lot of sense. As before, when I resumed, the backlight
wasn't coming back on, but I knew the machine was alive, as
capslock was working.  (Amusingly, I never noticed the backlight
wasn't coming back on until tonight, when I started debugging this
with the lights off.  Late-night debugging ftw).

I'll try and narrow down exactly where it's failing in the
backlight code next, but it's getting late here, so I may
leave this until tomorrow for further investigation.
Some other clues for anyone playing along at home:
This X60 has Intel graphics.  ie, I'm not using any of
the drivers that 'select FB_BACKLIGHT', so somewhere in
the common fb code is code that I'm guessing is dependant
upon the framebuffer driver doing something or other
if FB_BACKLIGHT is set.

(Adding Richard to Cc: as he seems to be responsible for
 the FB backlight code from what I can tell.)

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-04-16  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-16  0:05 Linux 2.6.21-rc7 Linus Torvalds
2007-04-16  0:37 ` [1/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions Adrian Bunk
2007-04-16 21:44   ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-04-17 10:09     ` Takashi Iwai
2007-04-19 20:03       ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-04-20 10:34         ` Takashi Iwai
2007-04-20 18:18           ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 18:26             ` Takashi Iwai
2007-04-23 10:19               ` Takashi Iwai
2007-04-16  0:37 ` [2/2] " Adrian Bunk
2007-04-16  0:54   ` Dave Jones
2007-04-16  1:16     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-04-16  3:44       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-16  6:29       ` Dave Jones [this message]
2007-04-16  6:54         ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-16  7:23           ` Dave Jones
2007-04-16  7:32             ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-16  7:55               ` Dave Jones
2007-04-16  9:26                 ` Richard Purdie
2007-04-17  3:34                   ` Dave Jones
2007-04-17 23:48                     ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-18  0:35                       ` Dave Jones
2007-04-16 10:06   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-20  4:57   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-20  5:03     ` Dave Jones
2007-04-20  5:15       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-20  5:19         ` Dave Jones
2007-04-20  5:33           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-20 14:51             ` Dave Jones
2007-04-20 15:28               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-20 16:03                 ` Dave Jones
2007-04-20 17:16                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-20 17:21                     ` Dave Jones
2007-04-21  0:02                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-21  9:45                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-17  0:01 ` Linux 2.6.21-rc7 Chuck Ebbert
2007-04-23 21:48 ` [1/3] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions (v2) Adrian Bunk
2007-04-23 22:18   ` Greg KH
2007-04-24  9:32     ` Wolfgang Erig
2007-04-25  0:14       ` Greg KH
2007-04-25  0:29         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-04-25  0:51           ` Greg KH
2007-04-25  1:21             ` Adrian Bunk
2007-04-25  8:19               ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-25 16:20               ` Wolfgang Erig
2007-04-23 21:48 ` [2/3] " Adrian Bunk
2007-04-23 21:49 ` [3/3] " Adrian Bunk
2007-04-25 11:06   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-25 11:31     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-04-25 13:01       ` Dave Jones
2007-04-25 13:50         ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-25 13:52           ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-25 14:33             ` Dave Jones
2007-04-25 15:24               ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-25 16:31                 ` Dave Jones
2007-04-25 23:00                   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-04-25 14:06         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-25 11:43     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-25 13:45       ` Jeff Chua
2007-05-02 21:44         ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-25 17:57     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-25 18:08     ` john stultz
2007-04-26  0:33       ` Len Brown
2007-04-26  0:49         ` john stultz
2007-04-25 19:34     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-25 23:40 ` 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions with patches Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070416062921.GB7528@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome