From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030683AbXDPOz6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:55:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030736AbXDPOz6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:55:58 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:47792 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030683AbXDPOz5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:55:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:55:27 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Tomasz K?oczko Cc: Stefan Richter , Jan Engelhardt , Mike Snitzer , Neil Brown , "David R. Litwin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ZFS with Linux: An Open Plea Message-ID: <20070416145527.GA26863@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Tomasz K?oczko , Stefan Richter , Jan Engelhardt , Mike Snitzer , Neil Brown , "David R. Litwin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <17952.5537.364603.419364@notabene.brown> <170fa0d20704140704l29d9db76q59195a3d9cad868a@mail.gmail.com> <46238204.9060907@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:20:41PM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote: > ZFS on Solaris provides for many workloads better speed than any Linux > technology on the same hardware but ZFS ond FUSE in current form provides > lower speed than now avalaible Linux technologies. Numbers, please. So far in all interesting benchmarks it actually was slower. But when they're faster than XFS somewhere I'd defintly be interesting in looking at why this is true and if possible and important enough fix it.