From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753253AbXDPSIb (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:08:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754125AbXDPSIb (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:08:31 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:57451 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753253AbXDPSIa (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:08:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:05:59 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Cornelia Huck Cc: linux-kernel , Alan Stern , Tejun Heo , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [Patch -mm 3/3] RFC: Introduce kobject->owner for refcounting. Message-ID: <20070416180559.GA5662@kroah.com> References: <20070416193627.1db62136@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070416193627.1db62136@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 07:36:27PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > Grab and release the module kobject refcount if kobj->owner is set. > This prevents calls to the release function after the module has > been unloaded. But doesn't this cause reference counts to be grabbed on modules that don't want them? (like network drivers)? I don't understand what exactly you are trying to protect from here. Especially as Tejun just ripped the lifetime rules between sysfs and kobjects apart. thanks, greg k-h