From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kyle McMartin <kyle@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@redhat.com, bcollins@ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Allow overriding module parameters from kernel command_line
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:45:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070418144512.14528b78.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070418155552.GA3744@athena.road.mcmartin.ca>
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:55:52 -0400 Kyle McMartin <kyle@canonical.com> wrote:
> With the move to initramfs and heavily modular configs, which include
> loading storage drivers from early userspace, it's becoming harder
> to provide users with a way of overriding module parameters at boot.
>
> Currently, users would have to break into the initramfs, edit the
> modprobe options, and then let boot continue. They have a much easier time
> dealing with adding options on the command line from Grub or what have you.
>
> I hacked out this patch quickly to re-parse saved_command_line[] when we
> load a module in an attempt to rectify this.
>
> (The specific use-case I was looking at here was HPA commands failing on
> sata_nv controllers, and needing to pass the adma=0 option to the module...
> Users had a hard time testing without an easy way of overriding the module.)
>
> Clearly this is not entirely optimal, because we're parsing command_line
> after the module params are parsed. This ends of being a policy decision,
> whether the /sbin/modprobe commandline should override the kernel
> command_line, or vice versa.
Similar-but-different: I was trying to persuade a Fedora system to use ext2
for the root filesystem the other day. Turns out that we somehow managed
to break `rootfstype=' in this situation and it cheerfully continued to use
ext3.
Fixed by changing /etc/fstab and rebuilding initrd, but IMO rootfstype=
should have worked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-18 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-18 15:55 Kyle McMartin
2007-04-18 16:25 ` Ben Collins
2007-04-18 21:45 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-04-18 22:47 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-18 22:58 ` mkinitrd. (was Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Allow overriding module parameters from kernel command_line) Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070418144512.14528b78.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=bcollins@ubuntu.com \
--cc=kyle@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome