From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422744AbXDRJm0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:42:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422745AbXDRJm0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:42:26 -0400 Received: from mail10.tpgi.com.au ([203.12.160.147]:40402 "EHLO mail10.tpgi.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422740AbXDRJmI (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:42:08 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2938 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:42:08 EDT X-TPG-Antivirus: Passed Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:49:23 +1000 From: Will Trives To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist Message-ID: <20070418184923.4f71f35c@disher.kickcrew> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Yet another hard drive which doesn't seem to get NCQ right. I have a Samsung 400LJ that appears to work fine with NCQ on an Intel 965 chipset motherboard (Asus P5B) and Linux kernel 2.6.20.7. Dmesg Output : scsi1 : ahci ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) ata2.00: ATA-7, max UDMA7, 781422768 sectors: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32) ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133 sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda scsi 1:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA SAMSUNG HD400LJ ZZ10 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 SCSI device sdb: 781422768 512-byte hdwr sectors (400088 MB) sdb: Write Protect is off sdb: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sdb: write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA SCSI device sdb: 781422768 512-byte hdwr sectors (400088 MB) sdb: Write Protect is off sdb: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sdb: write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sdb: sdb1 sdb2 Regards, Will Trives