From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754054AbXDXOmR (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:42:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754016AbXDXOmQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:42:16 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.231]:64529 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751052AbXDXOmP (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:42:15 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=GrNucBMy5mnIDkPhHzolo5hW7kfNIYIHYVBLrXDdktgkmrz09iBOIrE4MFMPIKfeb82+BZpWTxsiSV2aOlR1yAs79pj33odTa14the+/V7rGdPC5kjiOJw4WcIx2DpnRDUR1NEpK7HBdEIStfGnFIvO35kVrc2dfk8xiBXcNMlM= From: Gene Heskett Organization: Organization? very little To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:42:11 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Peter Williams , Arjan van de Ven , Linus Torvalds , Nick Piggin , Juliusz Chroboczek , Con Kolivas , ck list , Bill Davidsen , Willy Tarreau , William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Mike Galbraith , Thomas Gleixner , caglar@pardus.org.tr References: <200704220959.34978.kernel@kolivas.org> <20070424070800.GA23463@elte.hu> <20070424072520.GA28387@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20070424072520.GA28387@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704241042.11743.gene.heskett@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 24 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: >* Ingo Molnar wrote: >> yeah, i guess this has little to do with X. I think in your scenario >> it might have been smarter to either stop, or to renice the workloads >> that took away CPU power from others to _positive_ nice levels. >> Negative nice levels can indeed be dangerous. > >btw., was X itself at nice 0 or nice -10 when the lockup happened? > > Ingo Memory could be fuzzy Ingo, but I think it was at 0 at the time. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) I know it all. I just can't remember it all at once.