From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Miles Lane" <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm1 + sysfs patch -- RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (2123)
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:41:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070424234115.6c6bc7c3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a44ae5cd0704242335n637b1b5cwd027a3d253820f91@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:35:37 -0700 "Miles Lane" <miles.lane@gmail.com> wrote:
> And then this:
> [ 278.835674] RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (2123)
> [ 278.835684] [<c0104e0f>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
> [ 278.835701] [<c0105a26>] show_trace+0x12/0x14
> [ 278.835713] [<c0105ab3>] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
> [ 278.835723] [<f95c660a>] addrconf_notify+0x5dd/0x7d0 [ipv6]
> [ 278.835795] [<c0125572>] notifier_call_chain+0x2b/0x4a
> [ 278.835809] [<c01255be>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x19/0x1f
> [ 278.835822] [<c01255de>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x1a/0x1c
> [ 278.835834] [<c025041e>] netdev_state_change+0x23/0x35
> [ 278.835849] [<c0258e76>] rtnl_setlink+0x34f/0x3ef
> [ 278.835861] [<c025845e>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x198/0x1b2
> [ 278.835873] [<c025f4b3>] netlink_run_queue+0x6f/0xe1
> [ 278.835885] [<c0258277>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x29/0x44
> [ 278.835896] [<c025f82c>] netlink_data_ready+0x15/0x55
> [ 278.835907] [<c025e877>] netlink_sendskb+0x22/0x53
> [ 278.835918] [<c025f1f0>] netlink_unicast+0x1bb/0x1d5
> [ 278.835929] [<c025f80b>] netlink_sendmsg+0x246/0x252
> [ 278.835940] [<c02472e6>] sock_sendmsg+0xcc/0xe5
> [ 278.835951] [<c0247beb>] sys_sendto+0xcc/0xec
> [ 278.835961] [<c0247c41>] sys_send+0x36/0x38
> [ 278.835971] [<c02483f6>] sys_socketcall+0x13e/0x241
> [ 278.835982] [<c0103e66>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99
> [ 278.835993] =======================
yes, that's the one I mentioned in the release notes. It appears
to be harmless.
Dave has identified some fishiness in the netlink code which
might have caused this.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-25 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-25 6:35 Miles Lane
2007-04-25 6:41 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070424234115.6c6bc7c3.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome