From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Big reserved mappings on x86_64
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:49:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070425084931.GC355@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0704251035480.19711@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:42:20AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> I actually took a look at `pmap $$`, which reveals that a lot of shared
> libraries map 2044K or 2048K unreadable-unwritable-private
> mappings...for _what_ purpose?
>
> 10:37 opteron:~ > pmap $$
> 4403: bash
> START SIZE RSS DIRTY PERM MAPPING
> 2ae6cca70000 212K 172K 0K r-xp /lib64/libreadline.so.5.2
> 2ae6ccaa5000 2044K 0K 0K ---p /lib64/libreadline.so.5.2 <--
> 2ae6ccca4000 4K 4K 4K r--p /lib64/libreadline.so.5.2
> 2ae6ccca5000 28K 28K 28K rw-p /lib64/libreadline.so.5.2
> 2ae6cccac000 8K 8K 8K rw-p [anon]
> 2ae6cccae000 28K 16K 0K r-xp /lib64/libhistory.so.5.2
> 2ae6cccb5000 2048K 0K 0K ---p /lib64/libhistory.so.5.2 <--
> 2ae6cceb5000 8K 8K 8K rw-p /lib64/libhistory.so.5.2
> 2ae6cceb7000 320K 208K 0K r-xp /lib64/libncurses.so.5.5
> 2ae6ccf07000 2048K 0K 0K ---p /lib64/libncurses.so.5.5 <--
> 2ae6cd107000 48K 48K 48K r--p /lib64/libncurses.so.5.5
> 2ae6cd113000 28K 28K 28K rw-p /lib64/libncurses.so.5.5
> [...]
>
> What could these ominous mappings be? Does anyone else see that -
> perhaps someone with x86_64 && !(opensuse 10.2)?
While i386 only supports 4KB pages, x86_64 ELF objects ought to support
up to 2MB pages. The gap between read-only/executable and writable segments
is intentionally mapped PROT_NONE, so that other things aren't mapped in
between the segments.
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-25 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-25 8:42 Jan Engelhardt
2007-04-25 8:49 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2007-04-25 9:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-25 9:59 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070425084931.GC355@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®