From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1754435AbXDZBHi@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754435AbXDZBHi (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:07:38 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753944AbXDZBHh
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:07:37 -0400
Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([65.172.181.25]:45240 "EHLO
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753943AbXDZBHg convert rfc822-to-8bit
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:07:36 -0400
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:06:11 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
       Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, mb@bu3sch.de,
       linville@tuxdriver.com, maxextreme@gmail.com, gregkh@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2.
Message-Id: <20070425180611.25c563d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <200704260232.06909.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <20070423141123.GA21174@skybase>
	<20070425143011.57247c1d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<20070425172447.1576c399.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<200704260232.06909.arnd@arndb.de>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:32:06 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> On Thursday 26 April 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
> > scripts/spot-common-mistakes.  Feed it a unified diff and it would complain
> > about newly-added code (and only newly-added code) which has busted
> > whitespace, adds new semaphores, adds new kernel_thread calls, etc, etc.
> 
> http://patchstylecheck.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/patchstylecheckemail.pl
> Might serve as a starting point for this. It doesn't have any semantic
> checks right now, but I guess they can be added.
> 

	print "Your patch is now worthy to be reviewed by a real person\n";

heh.  Yes, that looks like an ideal starting point.

Methinks it should do `exit 1' if anything was detected.