From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030632AbXDZLdw (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:33:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030668AbXDZLdw (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:33:52 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:42542 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030632AbXDZLdw (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:33:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:33:36 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Johannes Berg Cc: Linus Torvalds , Nick Piggin , Mike Galbraith , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Con Kolivas , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy) Message-ID: <20070426113336.GV17387@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20070424212408.GD16457@elf.ucw.cz> <1177582633.6814.29.camel@johannes.berg> <20070426103051.GP17387@elf.ucw.cz> <20070426104052.GA19072@elf.ucw.cz> <1177585897.6814.49.camel@johannes.berg> <20070426111645.GR17387@elf.ucw.cz> <1177586850.6814.52.camel@johannes.berg> <20070426112641.GS17387@elf.ucw.cz> <1177587308.6814.57.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1177587308.6814.57.camel@johannes.berg> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Yes, probably will. The other option is to break existing 32-bit > > userspace, which is a bit more common AFAICT. > > Judging from experience with the wext 32/64 bit fiasco it seems to be > rather uncommon to use 32-bit userspace on 64-bit machines. Well, it would break 32-bit userspace on 32-bit kernel, which is the most common version, AFAICT. > Rafael hinted that we could just add these numbers, keep the existing > ones and then phase them out over time, but I haven't really given it > much thought. We could probably do that... but it is slightly ugly. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html