From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: use different lockdep subclass for s_active deactivation
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:22:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070426152221.GB16563@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070426145047.GF17130@htj.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:50:47PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> A sysfs node can delete other sysfs files when accessed. This results
> in recursive s_active locking - read lock for file access, down lock
> of the vicitim for deactivation. Tell lockdep that it's okay.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> ---
> Miles, please test this patch. It should remove the lockdep warning.
> Fixes for the other two problems will soon follow.
>
> Greg, Andrew, after all the fixes are verified, I'll merge the fixes
> into the original patches and resend all the sysfs updates in better
> shape. Sorry about all the trouble.
Thanks, that will make it easier for me, as I've seen a lot of them go
floating by recently :)
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-26 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-25 5:15 2.6.21-rc7-mm1 + sysfs-oops-workaround.patch -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected Miles Lane
2007-04-25 5:18 ` Tejun Heo
2007-04-25 14:48 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-25 23:45 ` Nonfunctional ethernet (was Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm1 + sysfs-oops-workaround.patch -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected) Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-26 1:02 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-26 1:13 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-26 2:26 ` Tejun Heo
2007-04-26 2:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-26 14:50 ` [PATCH] sysfs: use different lockdep subclass for s_active deactivation Tejun Heo
2007-04-26 15:22 ` Greg KH [this message]
2007-04-26 17:21 ` Miles Lane
2007-04-26 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2007-04-26 18:51 ` Miles Lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070426152221.GB16563@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®