From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161656AbXD3HBm (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:01:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161661AbXD3HBm (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:01:42 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:57587 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161659AbXD3HBl (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:01:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20070430.000138.17862632.davem@davemloft.net> To: mangoo@wpkg.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <46358809.4070909@wpkg.org> References: <46358809.4070909@wpkg.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Tomasz Chmielewski Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:09:13 +0200 > Why didn't you do it then? Why didn't you send your patch to the main > developer? > Wouldn't be your problem fixed if you did it? Because all the directions say to report bugs to the bugzilla via bugs.freedesktop.org, which I did. I went out of my way to go through the hassle of creating an account, figuring out which buttons to push, how to attach a patch, etc. And my reward for all that effort is that either my work gets ignored or I should send it to the mailing list? That's garbage. If bugs should be reported to the mailing list, then they should just get rid of bugzilla because it's aparently serving as a garbage bin.