From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161707AbXEAK2l (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 06:28:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161686AbXEAK2l (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 06:28:41 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:56708 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161707AbXEAK2j (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 06:28:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:28:38 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Steven Whitehouse Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Josef Whiter Subject: Re: [GFS2] fix bz 231369, gfs2 will oops if you specify an invalid mount option [2/34] Message-ID: <20070501102838.GA29429@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Steven Whitehouse , cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Josef Whiter References: <1178013376.5462.127.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com> <1178013544.5462.131.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1178013544.5462.131.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Having the bugzilla ids in the subject it a bit annoying. I understand that cross-referencing bugs to patches is quite useful, but could you use a special tag in the message body instead, similar to how XFS use the SGI-PV: tag. This also means you tell people which bugzilla the bug actually was in.