From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423630AbXEAUuZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 16:50:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946003AbXEAUuS (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 16:50:18 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:50769 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423619AbXEAUtr (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 16:49:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 21:49:46 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 00/33] m68k patches for 2.6.22 Message-ID: <20070501204946.GB21080@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20070501203234.252205858@mail.of.borg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070501203234.252205858@mail.of.borg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Btw, is there any chance you could update m68k to use the generic irq code? The only architectures that don't have a conversion in progress are m68k, m68knommu and arm26