mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: ck@vds.kolivas.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ck] 2.6.21-ck1-rc1
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:17:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705012217.14395.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705012143.38677.Martin@lichtvoll.de>

Am Dienstag 01 Mai 2007 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> Am Dienstag 01 Mai 2007 schrieb Con Kolivas:
> > Let's call this a release candidate for 2.6.21-ck1. I've managed to
> > be well enough for enough time to bang this out.
> >
> > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/pre-releases/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck1-rc1/

[...]

> Hello Con!
>
> Works nicely here. Did my usual stress testing... music playback is
> absolutely smooth.
>
> I will test it during the next 1-2 days at least.
>
> Got ridicolous long releasenames now ;-):
> 2.6.21.1-tp23-sws2-2.2.9.13-ck1-rc1-hotfix-sched-idleprio
> 2.6.21.1-tp42-sws2-2.2.9.13-ck1-rc1-hotfix-sched-idleprio
>
> Feels really very responsive. Those other patches seem to add to the
> responsiveness to sd-0.46 quite well. Can't really tell whether cfs-v7
> or cfs-v8-rc3 is really a slight bit smoother or not. Subjectively

[as I initially thought when comparind sd-0.46 without other ck patches 
with cfs]

> seems to be pretty much the same now.

Hmmm, maybe thats the desktop tune patch which sets rr_interval for SD to 
6 (from the default of 8) making the difference here.

Anyway its very difficult to tell a difference between ck1-rc1 and 
CFS-v8-rc3 from subjective perception. I am really satisfied with both of 
them.

-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7

           reply	other threads:[~2007-05-01 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <200705012143.38677.Martin@lichtvoll.de>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200705012217.14395.Martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®