Bill Irwin wrote:
>> I had the same question about yours and just brute-force merged. Not a
>> big deal for me to rediff against whatever everyone's working off of.

On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 12:07:29AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> I picked up one version of your patches you posted a couple of days ago,
> but I guess you've posted the series multiple times, presumably with
> differences.
> How about posting the series again and I can test it out?

>From the looks of it, I'm totally out-of-synch. Here are the 4 (the
fourth should be partially folded into the third but also partially
folded into the first), included as MIME attachments.

As an aside, it looks like failures here need to eventually propagate
to __cpu_up(). irq_ctx_init() needs to return a status, and its callers
need to check it. irq_ctx_init() probably also needs to be __cpuinit.


-- wli