From: Rob Sims <lkml-z@robsims.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Thomas Glanzmann" <thomas@glanzmann.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Andreas Allgöwer" <andreas.allgoewer@web.de>,
"Michael Gernoth" <simigern@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: Re: sky2 PHY setup
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:22:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070506202234.GB17957@robsims.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070407175348.GB18457@robsims.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1337 bytes --]
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 11:53:48AM -0600, Rob Sims wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:19:30AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
...
> > You might have over run the hub and it wedged. Try doing:
> > ethtool -r eth0
> > that forces a down/up
>
> I'm still seeing throughput drop to under 1 Mb/s (50-100kB/s)
> periodically. I did an ethtool -S and ethtool -d to capture state.
> (sky2-fail.log). I ran ethtool -r and retested; no change
> (sky2-ethtool-r.log). Finally, ifdown - rmmod - modprobe - ifup, which
> restored to Gigabit speeds (96+ MB/s), (sky2-modcycle.log).
>
> Please let me know if there's anything else I can poke into. As a
> reminder, this is a 88E8053 r20. Next time I see a degradation, I'll
> try cycling the switch.
I continued to have problems with this interface. I tried bringing up
the second interface on the motherboard; I added a cable to the same hub
as the first interface and configured an address on the same subnet.
I intended to see if I could use it as a redundant interface for when
the first hung. I haven't been able to test that, because now I haven't
seen a hang or slowdown since I brought the second interface up.
Could the idle interface have generated an interrupt which is never
cleared because the interface is down? Or something similar?
--
Rob
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-06 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070202102705.3cf028a6@freekitty>
[not found] ` <20070202210934.GM1693@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
[not found] ` <20070202151601.677ec5d9@freekitty>
[not found] ` <20070203073012.GO1693@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
[not found] ` <20070205090429.31d7bd32@freekitty>
[not found] ` <20070222193611.GR20035@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
2007-03-16 0:29 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2007-03-16 16:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-16 20:36 ` Rob Sims
2007-03-16 21:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-27 3:24 ` Rob Sims
2007-04-04 18:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-04-07 17:53 ` Rob Sims
2007-05-06 20:22 ` Rob Sims [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070506202234.GB17957@robsims.com \
--to=lkml-z@robsims.com \
--cc=andreas.allgoewer@web.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=simigern@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
--cc=thomas@glanzmann.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome