On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:31:32PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> I think Andi's handling the mergework on those patches, but I'll check
>> in to see if I should rediff vs. -mm or what if you want them.
>> Andi, what's the verdict on those stack patches?

On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:59:50AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I planned to merge them partially. Add the separate 4/8/irqstack options,
> add the vmalloc support, but not support the > 8K stacks. Haven't yet.

I respun things to incorporate some of hch's suggestions and to fix
an issue Jeremy Fitzhardinge had with CPU hotplug, and some suggestion
from someone else, too.

Basically what changed was:
( 1) drop the large stack config option patch entirely
( 2) fold the __pa() check into the vmalloc stack patch under #ifdef
( 3) rename CONFIG_VMALLOC_STACK to CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK
( 4) fold guarding CPU 0's IRQ stack into the vmalloc stack patch
( 5) make IRQ stacks unconditional instead of independently configurable
( 6) check slab_is_available() for CPU 0's bootmem vs. get_free_pages()
( 7) mark various things __cpuinit that needed to be
( 8) handle and propagate allocation errors up to __cpu_up()
( 9) redo CPU 0's IRQ stack allocation to normalize it for hotplug
(10) use a struct for IRQ stack state instead of 3 per_cpu vars

The current patch series needs the two fixup patches at the end folded
back into the patches it fixes up, but follows in its entirety as a
series of MIME attachments. I've no idea what it applies against.


-- wli