From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:13:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070508161309.c398a913.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.0.99.0705081306000.15420@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Tue, 8 May 2007 13:20:31 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
>
> > > Since 'volatile' has two different semantics depending on the context in
> > > which it is used, this warning should be appended to include the fact that
> > > it is legitimate to use for inline assembly.
> >
> > I think it hasn't two semantics, it's like arguing that char has two
> > semantics.
> >
> > Volatile does one thing - prohibits C compiler from optimizing
> > accesses to the variable. Either with (volatile *) casts and with
> > volatile var;
> >
>
> What the meaning of an "access" to a volatile memory-mapped I/O port or a
> variable that can be asynchronously interrupted is implementation-defined.
>
> You're only citing qualified versions of objects.
>
> In an asm construct, if all your input operands are modified and specified
> as output operands as well, volatile must be added so that the entire
> construct is not optimized away. Additionally, it must be added if your
> construct modifies memory that is neither listed in inputs nor outputs to
> the construct so that it is known to have at least one side-effect. Then,
> the compiler cannot delete your construct if it is reachable because it
> may produce such side-effects.
>
> Thus, the warning that was proposed for addition to CodingStyle should be
> modified to explicitly state that the use of 'volatile' for asm constructs
> is perfectly legitimate and its use as a type qualifier for objects in
> code is inappropriate.
It's already there, isn't it? <quote from original:>
The only acceptable uses for "volatile" are:
- in _code_, i.e., for things like the definition of "readb()" etc, where we
use it to force a particular access.
- with inline asms
- on "jiffies", for stupid legacy reasons
</quote>
or are you saying that you want to subject/header/title modified also?
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-08 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-01 5:08 [RFC, PATCH 2/4] SoC base drivers: ASIC3 SoC hardware definitions Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 6:56 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-01 10:27 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-01 12:04 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 12:21 ` Jamey Hicks
2007-05-08 19:14 ` [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil Randy Dunlap
2007-05-08 19:18 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-08 20:00 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-05-08 20:20 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-08 23:13 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2007-05-08 23:54 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-09 0:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-08 21:05 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-08 21:10 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-05-08 21:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-08 21:26 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-08 21:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-08 21:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-08 21:27 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-08 21:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-08 21:59 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-08 22:04 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-08 22:19 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-08 22:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-08 22:35 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-08 23:09 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-08 21:29 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-08 20:07 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-08 23:34 ` [PATCH] " Randy Dunlap
2007-05-09 0:06 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-09 2:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-09 2:38 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-09 3:15 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-09 9:21 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-09 9:26 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-09 13:31 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-09 10:25 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-09 13:36 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-09 18:41 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-09 20:23 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-09 20:25 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-09 22:47 ` Rob Landley
2007-05-09 8:50 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-09 15:52 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-09 19:04 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-09 1:47 ` [RFC/PATCH] " Jonathan Corbet
2007-05-09 9:43 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2007-05-09 19:34 ` Satyam Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070508161309.c398a913.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmiscml@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®