From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 10:11:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070509081105.GA5857@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46417215.6060204@zytor.com>
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 12:02:45AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hpa/newsetup-36f021b5.patch
> >
> > Are you planning to rebase to -linus and then let
> > arch/x86_64/boot/Makefile be a reference to i386/boot/Makefile?
> >
> > The patch for kbuild to enable this is in -linus now.
> >
> > As for the important part (the code) I have not looked.
>
> I have rebased to -linus, but I'm a bit scared about making that
> particular change at this time, mostly because it requires some
> additional Makefile work which I would be happier to apply later, in
> order to make the "create clean patchset" task easier.
>
> All the source code is shared, but for right now the Makefiles are
> slightly different, mostly w.r.t. CFLAGS.
OK, let me know if you want me to take a look at something specific.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-09 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-09 5:15 H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-09 6:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-09 7:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-09 8:11 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2007-05-10 14:10 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-10 18:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-10 18:38 ` Martin Mares
2007-05-11 0:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-10 22:04 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-10 22:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 12:21 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-12 14:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 18:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 18:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 18:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 22:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 22:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-11 4:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-11 23:58 ` Kevin Winchester
2007-05-12 0:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-13 0:35 ` Kevin Winchester
2007-05-15 20:45 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070509081105.GA5857@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
--cc=adaplas@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome