From: Bernhard Schiffner <bernhard@schiffner-limbach.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: CFS & rt-preempt : orthogonal patches possible ?
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 08:44:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705090844.19000.bernhard@schiffner-limbach.de> (raw)
Hallo (Ingo),
testing something regarding linuxpps I want to do it against the "latest
and greatest kernel ever" too.
rt-preempt is common from audio already.
CFS something new and promising.
But the patches conflict in their combination.
Is there something against this type of combination?
Is there perhaps a solution?
TIA
Bernhard
PS: ck's SD-patch conflicts too...
reply other threads:[~2007-05-09 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705090844.19000.bernhard@schiffner-limbach.de \
--to=bernhard@schiffner-limbach.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®