From: Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@free.fr>
To: "Indan Zupancic" <indan@nul.nu>
Cc: "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@garzik.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
gregkh@suse.de, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [git patch] move USB net drivers to drivers/net
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:27:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705101427.30990.duncan.sands@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358.81.207.0.53.1178799167.squirrel@secure.samage.net>
On Thursday 10 May 2007 14:12:47 Indan Zupancic wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 03:38, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > This was ACK'd by Greg, as you see in the sign-offs. See the commit
> > below for rationale.
> >
> > USB is now treated like other buses, for network drivers:
> > * USB network driver patches should go to me and netdev
> > * Just like in PCI or PCMCIA land, bus-specific code may
> > originate from the USB side of the house (Greg's tree).
> >
> >
> >
> > Please pull from 'usb-move' branch of
> > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git usb-move
> >
> > to receive the following update:
> >
> >
> > commit 5b2fc499917e5897a13add780e181b4cef197072
> > Author: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
> > Date: Wed May 9 21:31:55 2007 -0400
> >
> > Move USB network drivers to drivers/net/usb.
> >
> > It is preferable to group drivers by usage (net, scsi, ATA, ...) than
> > by bus. When reviewing drivers, the [PCI|USB|PCMCIA|...] maintainer
> > is probably less qualified on networking issues than a networking
> > maintainer. Also, from a practical standpoint, chips often
> > appear on multiple buses, which is why we do not put drivers into
> > drivers/pci/net.
>
> What about drivers/usb/atm/?
I don't mind if it moves to drivers/atm/, though I don't see the point of it.
Best wishes,
Duncan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-10 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-10 1:38 Jeff Garzik
2007-05-10 12:12 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-10 12:27 ` Duncan Sands [this message]
2007-05-10 16:12 ` [another git " Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-17 10:45 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705101427.30990.duncan.sands@free.fr \
--to=duncan.sands@free.fr \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®