mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anant Nitya <kernel@prachanda.info>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] local_softirq_pending storm
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:11:22 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705171211.23350.kernel@prachanda.hub> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178834326.22481.18.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Friday 11 May 2007 03:28:46 Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> Ok, that's consistent with earlier reports. The problem surfaces when
> one of the SMT-"cpus" goes idle. The problem goes away when you disable
> hyperthreading.
Yes with HT disabled in BIOS there is no local_softirq_pending messages. BTW 
why does this problem persist only with X ? 

> When you apply the ratelimit patch, does the softlockup problem
> persist ?
>
Yes, though softlockup is rare and mostly hit when system is under high load. 
Apart of that I am also getting following messages consistently across 
multiple boot cycles with NOHZ=y and ratelimit patch applied.

May 15 11:51:22 rudra kernel: [ 2594.341068] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 
28111260302 ns)
May 15 11:51:22 rudra kernel: [ 2594.343194] Time: acpi_pm clocksource has 
been installed.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-17  6:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-09 14:12 Anant Nitya
2007-05-09 16:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-10 11:53   ` Anant Nitya
2007-05-10 21:58     ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-17  6:41       ` Anant Nitya [this message]
2007-05-18 13:01         ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-19  4:30           ` Anant Nitya
2007-05-19  9:55           ` Anant Nitya
2007-05-19 19:11             ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-19 21:23               ` Anant Nitya
2007-05-20 21:43                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-21  6:22                   ` Anant Nitya
2007-05-21  9:01                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-21 10:02                       ` Anant Nitya
2007-05-21 18:45                       ` Anant Nitya
2007-05-22 19:03                   ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-05-22 19:59                     ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-05-22 20:10                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-22 20:23                       ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-05-23 17:00                       ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-23 18:38                         ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-23 23:24                           ` Anant Nitya
2007-05-24  7:45                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-20 10:18               ` Heiko Carstens
2007-05-20 13:52                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-20 18:36                   ` Heiko Carstens
     [not found]                     ` <20070520191800.GA14225@osiris.ibm.com>
     [not found]                       ` <1179689389.6570.1.camel@chaos>
     [not found]                         ` <20070521200428.GA9855@osiris.ibm.com>
2007-05-23 20:54                           ` Mikulas Patocka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200705171211.23350.kernel@prachanda.hub \
    --to=kernel@prachanda.info \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome