From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760045AbXEUI2y (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 04:28:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755689AbXEUI2r (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 04:28:47 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:40441 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755251AbXEUI2r (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 04:28:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 10:28:05 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: David Miller Cc: kernel@prachanda.info, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: bad networking related lag in v2.6.22-rc2 Message-ID: <20070521082805.GA17740@elte.hu> References: <20070518102607.GA23151@elte.hu> <200705200246.22444.kernel@prachanda.hub> <20070521075824.GA11198@elte.hu> <20070521.012541.112621369.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070521.012541.112621369.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * David Miller wrote: > From: Ingo Molnar > Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 09:58:24 +0200 > > > what does 'top' show during an upload? Is any system related task > > out of whack? Could you try to get a readprofile or an oprofile > > output from the kernel, so that we can see what is slowing it down > > so much? It could be something networking related in v2.6.22-rc2. > > There is a driver specific problem that's been around for a while, but > it only effects 3c59x chips, is that what you have? the problem first showed up in v2.6.22-rc1 and he didnt have it in v2.6.21 - does that still qualify his box for the 3c59x problem? Ingo