From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: filesystem benchmarking fun
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:39:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070522183935.GF6138@think.oraclecorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070522112120.4a5c6a5d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:21:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > I patched jbd's log_do_checkpoint to put all the blocks it wanted to
> > write in a radix tree, then send them all down in order at the end.
>
> Side note: we already have all of that capability in the kernel:
> sync_inode(blockdev_inode, wbc) will do an ascending-LBA write of the whole
> blockdev.
>
> It could be that as a quick diddle, running sync_inode() in
> do-block-on-queue-congestion mode prior to doing the checkpoint would have
> some benefit.
I had played with this in the past (although not this time around), but
I had performance problems with newly dirtied blocks sneaking in.
> > At any rate, it may be worth putzing with the writeback routines to try
> > and find dirty pages close by in the block dev inode when doing data
> > writeback. My guess is that ext3 should be going 1.5x to 2x faster for
> > this particular run, but that's a huge amount of complexity added so I'm
> > not convinced it is a great idea.
>
> Yes, this is a distinct disadvantage of the whole per-address-space
> writeback scheme - we're leaving IO scheduling optimisations on the floor,
> especially wrt the blockdev inode, but probably also wrt regular-file
> versus regular-file. Even if one makes the request queue tremendously
> huge, that won't help if there's dirty data close-by the disk head which
> hasn't even been put into the queue yet.
>
I'm not sure yet on a good way to fix it, but I do think I've nailed
it down as the cause of the strange performance numbers I'm getting.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-22 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-16 14:42 Chris Mason
2007-05-16 16:01 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-16 17:11 ` Chris Mason
2007-05-16 18:25 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 19:13 ` Chris Mason
2007-05-16 19:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 19:53 ` Chris Mason
2007-05-16 20:04 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 20:14 ` Chris Mason
2007-05-16 20:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 21:02 ` Chris Mason
2007-05-24 17:29 ` Vara Prasad
2007-05-22 16:35 ` Chris Mason
2007-05-22 17:50 ` John Stoffel
2007-05-22 18:12 ` Chris Mason
2007-05-22 18:21 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-22 18:39 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2007-05-22 21:25 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-25 7:14 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-16 18:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-16 19:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-16 19:16 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2007-05-16 19:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-18 3:32 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-05-16 19:25 ` Chris Mason
2007-05-16 21:01 Al Boldi
2007-05-17 11:52 Xu CanHao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070522183935.GF6138@think.oraclecorp.com \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome