mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AFS: Implement file locking
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 22:25:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070527022502.GB10867@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7436.1180223730@redhat.com>

On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 12:55:30AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> 
> > > +	if (!afs_lock_manager) {
> > > +		afs_lock_manager = create_singlethread_workqueue("kafs_lockd");
> > > +		if (!afs_lock_manager)
> > > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > > +	}
> > > +	return 0;
> > 
> > Doesn't this need some locking?
> 
> Oops.  Yes.  It used to be inside the lock_kernel() section, but has since
> escaped.

The BKL wouldn't help, since create_singlethread_workqueue() can sleep.
Or am I missing something?

> > Do you allow upgrades and downgrades?  (Just curious.)
> 
> AFS does not, as far as I know.

So if I request a write lock while holding a read lock, my request will
be denied?

> > > +		/* if we've already got a readlock on the server and no waiting
> > > +		 * writelocks, then we might be able to instantly grant another
> > 
> > Is that comment correct?  (You don't really test for "waiting
> > writelocks", do you?)
> 
> Locally, yes.  'if (list_empty(&vnode->pending_locks))' covers it quite
> handily.

Oops, right, I was overlooking that check.

This is a little strange, though--if there's somebody waiting for a
write lock on an inode (because somebody else already holds a read lock
on it), that shouldn't block requests for read locks.

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-27  2:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-24 16:55 David Howells
2007-05-25  7:31 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-05-26  2:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-26  3:11   ` Kyle Moffett
2007-05-27  0:12   ` David Howells
2007-05-26 23:55 ` David Howells
2007-05-27  2:25   ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2007-05-27  8:51   ` David Howells
2007-05-27 16:12     ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-29  9:34     ` David Howells
2007-05-29 20:08       ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-29 12:43     ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070527022502.GB10867@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome