From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AFS: Implement file locking
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 22:25:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070527022502.GB10867@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7436.1180223730@redhat.com>
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 12:55:30AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
>
> > > + if (!afs_lock_manager) {
> > > + afs_lock_manager = create_singlethread_workqueue("kafs_lockd");
> > > + if (!afs_lock_manager)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > + }
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > Doesn't this need some locking?
>
> Oops. Yes. It used to be inside the lock_kernel() section, but has since
> escaped.
The BKL wouldn't help, since create_singlethread_workqueue() can sleep.
Or am I missing something?
> > Do you allow upgrades and downgrades? (Just curious.)
>
> AFS does not, as far as I know.
So if I request a write lock while holding a read lock, my request will
be denied?
> > > + /* if we've already got a readlock on the server and no waiting
> > > + * writelocks, then we might be able to instantly grant another
> >
> > Is that comment correct? (You don't really test for "waiting
> > writelocks", do you?)
>
> Locally, yes. 'if (list_empty(&vnode->pending_locks))' covers it quite
> handily.
Oops, right, I was overlooking that check.
This is a little strange, though--if there's somebody waiting for a
write lock on an inode (because somebody else already holds a read lock
on it), that shouldn't block requests for read locks.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-27 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-24 16:55 David Howells
2007-05-25 7:31 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-05-26 2:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-26 3:11 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-05-27 0:12 ` David Howells
2007-05-26 23:55 ` David Howells
2007-05-27 2:25 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2007-05-27 8:51 ` David Howells
2007-05-27 16:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-29 9:34 ` David Howells
2007-05-29 20:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-29 12:43 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070527022502.GB10867@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome