From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: rpjday@mindspring.com
Cc: jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stuff ready to be deleted?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 01:46:10 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070529.014610.23017882.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705290419370.23055@localhost.localdomain>
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 04:20:24 -0400 (EDT)
> On Tue, 29 May 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> >
> > On May 28 2007 18:25, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >On Mon, 28 May 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >
> > >> >currently, the list contains the items:
> > >> >
> > >> > * 4 Traffic policing
> > >>
> > >> CONFIG_NET_SCHED? CONFIG_NET_ACT_POLICE? Neither seems
> > >> marked as deprecated/obsoleted in Kconfig.
> > >
> > >the "traffic policing" entry in that list refers specifically to the
> > >config option "CLS_NET_POLICE" in net/sched/Kconfig:
> > >
> > >config NET_CLS_POLICE
> > > bool "Traffic Policing (obsolete)"
> > > depends on NET_CLS_ACT!=y
> > >
> > >so ... does "obsolete" really mean "obsolete"?
> >
> > Have you taken a look at the Makefile? See this oddity:
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_NET_ACT_POLICE) += act_police.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_NET_CLS_POLICE) += act_police.o
> >
> > So is the Kconfig entry all that is obsolete?
>
> ah, i hadn't noticed that. how odd. now i don't know *what* to
> think.
Look at what tests that config option in the code, not just
what the makefiles do.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-29 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-28 20:15 Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-28 20:24 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-05-28 21:14 ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2007-05-28 21:23 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-05-28 20:44 ` Oliver Pinter
2007-05-28 20:52 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-28 23:49 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 22:24 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-28 22:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-29 8:34 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-29 8:47 ` David Miller
2007-05-28 21:18 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-05-28 21:30 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-28 22:25 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-28 22:41 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-29 6:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-29 8:20 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-29 8:46 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-05-29 7:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-05-29 13:04 ` Finn Thain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070529.014610.23017882.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®