From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765202AbXE2T65 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2007 15:58:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764583AbXE2T6t (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2007 15:58:49 -0400 Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il ([84.95.2.1]:53309 "EHLO mtaout1.012.net.il" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764726AbXE2T6s (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2007 15:58:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 22:58:27 +0300 From: David Baron Subject: Re: [LAU] 2.6.21-rt7 Oopses, More X-012-Sender: d_baron@012.net.il To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <200705292258.27890.d_baron@012.net.il> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Di, 29.05.07 21:37 David Baron wrote: > >Ran for nearly two hours with none. Nada. > > >Then they started up again. What triggered them? > > >The only thing in the logcheck at the same time as the first outputs > >was a pptp connect after the original connection fell. Relevant? > > The offending functions are icmp_.... functions, most likely the more > used ipv4 flavor of icmp.c. > > Example: > BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: > IRQ-9/1110 caller is icmp_xmit_unlock+0xb/0x30 > [] debug_smp_processor_id+0xa9/0xb0 > [] icmp_xmit_unlock+0xb/0x30 > [] icmp_send+0x11e/0x3f0 > .... Could you please a) add a Re: to the subject before answering yourself, so this gets a thread, instead of single mails. and b) maybe CC linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org as I do not think Ingo Molnar is subscribed to this list here, but it would be good if he also gets your reports in order to fix it. Thanks.