From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] 0/2: PCI MMCONFIG-related updates
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:21:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705300821.11555.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <465CF712.2010604@shaw.ca>
On Tuesday, May 29, 2007 9:01:22 Robert Hancock wrote:
> These two patches implement some changes in behavior related to PCI
> MMCONFIG configuration space access. One changes the way in which we
> validate the MCFG table provided by the BIOS by checking it against
> ACPI motherboard resources instead of the E820 table. The BIOS is not
> required to reserve this area in the E820 table, so checking that
> results in MMCONFIG being unnecessarily disabled on some machines.
>
> Some Intel chipsets where MMCONFIG was being disabled previously
> (but won't be with the first patch) had problems, not due to the
> MCFG table being broken, but because the access was hosed by the way
> in which we do PCI BAR sizing. The second patch fixes this problem.
>
> This is requested for inclusion in the -mm tree for testing.
Robert, should we also pull in the 915 and 965 chipset specific register
poking code? It might be a good sanity check against ACPI (i.e. if ACPI and
the actual register window disagree, we can assume the BIOS is broken and
MCFG is not safe to use). If so, I'll update and repost them against your
patchset.
Thanks,
Jesse
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-30 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-30 4:01 Robert Hancock
2007-05-30 15:21 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2007-05-30 23:31 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705300821.11555.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®