From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754087AbXE3PAn (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2007 11:00:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752134AbXE3PAh (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2007 11:00:37 -0400 Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il ([84.95.2.10]:11084 "EHLO mtaout4.012.net.il" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751925AbXE3PAg (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2007 11:00:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:00:29 +0300 From: David Baron Subject: RE: 2.6.21-rt7 Oopses X-012-Sender: d_baron@012.net.il To: linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <200705301800.29903.d_baron@012.net.il> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Verrry eeeenteresting (showing my age): Kdiff3 if fantastic. Looked at the entire source tree for -rt1 and -rt7. Found nothing changed touching any of the "oopses" that I have seen. What has been added, however, seems to be the trace-back code to display them. (Hypervisor code has been removed but my PIII clunker has no kvm support in any event.) Am I correct? These displayed "oopses" are problematic or simply debugging messages? They seem to not have effected anything outside of my log files :-) Safe to ignore them and keep using -rt7 or wait on this?