mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] muptiple bugs in PI futexes
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:39:49 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070605173949.GA27618@ms2.inr.ac.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1181060711.4404.114.camel@chaos>

Hello!

> Hmm, what means not expected ? -ESRCH is returned, when the owner task
> is not found. 

This is not supposed to happen with robust futexes.

glibs aborts (which is correct), or for build with disabled debugging
enters simulated deadlock (which is confusing).


> lock. Also using uval is wrong.

Yup. You are right.

This means those RETRY messages could be spurious. I must rerun the test.


> This does not really explain, why you do prevent the -ESRCH return value
> in the next cycle,

Because right curval is refetched, it already has FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit set
and we succesfully take the lock.


> No, -EDEADLK is returned from here:
> 
> 	ret = rt_mutex_timed_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to, 1);

Of course. It is the only place where ret is set. :-)

> 
> The rtmutex code only returns -EDEADLK, when the lock is already held by
> the task

This case.

> The fix is to remove it and to find the real cause of the problem.
> 
> I'm running the glibc tests since hours w/o tripping into it.

OK.

You need run only tst-robustpi8 in loop. It should be triggered quickly,
a few of minutes on 8-way smp here.

If you want, I can insert some debugging printks, which you need,
and run the test here.

Alexey

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-05 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-07 14:43 Alexey Kuznetsov
2007-05-23  7:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-23 11:51   ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2007-06-05 16:25     ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-05 17:39       ` Alexey Kuznetsov [this message]
2007-06-05 18:48         ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-05 19:15           ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-05 21:00             ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2007-06-05 21:13               ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070605173949.GA27618@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --to=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®