Re: Bad behaviour after hdparm -M 128

[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>]

On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2007.06.06 12:44:42 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > > >I used kernel 2.6.21 with the libata PIIX SATA driver and a
> > > >Seagate ST98823AS drive.
> > > 
> > > Yes, that's expected if the drive rejects the command.
> > 
> > Are *all* SATA drives rejecting the command?  Mine doesn't accept it,
> > either.  And it should, AFAIK, unless IBM's HDAPS-enabled firmware started
> > ripping out accousting management from Hitachi drives, which I don't find
> > very likely...
> 
> Works here, using a WDC WD1600AAJS-00PSA0 and sata_nv.

I am also using libata PIIX like the first person reporting the problem, but
it is a PATA drive behind a SATA-PATA bridge (it is a IBM T43 notebook).
Hmm...

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh