From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
drepper@redhat.com, roland@redhat.com, arjan@infradead.org,
mingo@elte.hu, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jmorris@namei.org,
chrisw@redhat.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, sgrubb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Protection for exploiting null dereference using mmap
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 19:01:59 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706061902.05786.russell@coker.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1181075666.3978.31.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 06:34, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> wrote:
> This patch uses a new SELinux security class "memprotect." Policy
> already contains a number of allow rules like a_t self:process *
> (unconfined_t being one of them) which mean that putting this check in
> the process class (its best current fit) would make it useless as all
I think it would be best to use the process class and change the "*" rules to
~{ memprotect }.
--
russell@coker.com.au
http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Blog
http://www.coker.com.au/sponsorship.html Sponsoring Free Software development
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-06 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1180561713.3633.27.camel@dhcp231-215.rdu.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20070603205653.GE25869@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <1180964306.14220.34.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
2007-06-05 20:34 ` Eric Paris
2007-06-05 21:00 ` James Morris
2007-06-05 21:16 ` Alan Cox
2007-06-05 21:28 ` Eric Paris
2007-06-05 22:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-07 14:28 ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-06 12:47 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-06-07 16:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-06 6:30 ` Eric Paris
2007-06-06 13:21 ` James Morris
2007-06-06 17:30 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-06-06 18:01 ` James Morris
2007-06-06 18:06 ` Chris Wright
2007-06-20 19:48 ` Adam Jackson
2007-06-05 22:49 ` Chris Wright
2007-06-05 22:53 ` Chris Wright
2007-06-06 12:12 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-06-06 9:01 ` Russell Coker [this message]
2007-06-06 12:18 ` Stephen Smalley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200706061902.05786.russell@coker.com.au \
--to=russell@coker.com.au \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®