From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966990AbXFHA32 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 20:29:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933876AbXFHA3U (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 20:29:20 -0400 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:53125 "EHLO mail.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933871AbXFHA3T (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 20:29:19 -0400 Message-Id: <20070607235106.387346000@linutronix.de> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-1 Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:29:14 -0000 From: Thomas Gleixner To: Andrew Morton Cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Alexey Kuznetsov , Ulrich Drepper , Eric Dumazet , Stable Team Subject: [patch 0/4] PI-Futex bugfixes and cleanups Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew, the following patch series solves the issues with pi-futexes which were reported from Alexey. While the first three patches should go mainline ASAP, the last patch is not necessarily 2.6.22 material. I did this cleanup to make the code more readable again. @stable: The rtmutex patches (1,2) should apply to stable as is, but the futex patch will not. I'm going to backport the fixes tomorrow and send a seperate series with all fixes. Pending problems: There are also the pending REQUEUE_PI issues. I have seen some problems there, but I did not address them in this patch set. I have no test program to verify any changes in that code. I'm not sure, whether we should keep the REQUEUE_PI stuff for 2.6.22. I'd prefer to back it out or at least disable it, so we can fix it proper for 2.6.23. tglx Sorry for the resend. My mailer did not notice the CC wreckage --