mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] pi-futex: Fix exit races and locking problems
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 09:16:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070608071611.GB30226@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070607235801.558491000@linutronix.de>


* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
> 
> 1. New entries can be added to tsk->pi_state_list after task completed
>    exit_pi_state_list(). The result is memory leakage and deadlocks.
> 
> 2. handle_mm_fault() is called under spinlock. The result is obvious.
> 
> 3. results in self-inflicted deadlock inside glibc.
>    Sometimes futex_lock_pi returns -ESRCH, when it is not expected
>    and glibc enters to for(;;) sleep() to simulate deadlock. This problem
>    is quite obvious and I think the patch is right. Though it looks like
>    each "if" in futex_lock_pi() got some stupid special case "else if". :-)
> 
> 4. sometimes futex_lock_pi() returns -EDEADLK,
>    when nobody has the lock. The reason is also obvious (see comment
>    in the patch), but correct fix is far beyond my comprehension.
>    I guess someone already saw this, the chunk:
> 
>                         if (rt_mutex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex))
>                                 ret = 0;
> 
>    is obviously from the same opera. But it does not work, because the
>    rtmutex is really taken at this point: wake_futex_pi() of previous
>    owner reassigned it to us. My fix works. But it looks very stupid.
>    I would think about removal of shift of ownership in wake_futex_pi()
>    and making all the work in context of process taking lock.
> 
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> 
> Fix 1) Avoid the tasklist lock variant of the exit race fix by adding
>     an additional state transition to the exit code.
> 
>     This fixes also the issue, when a task with recursive segfaults
>     is not able to release the futexes.
> 
> Fix 2) Cleanup the lookup_pi_state() failure path and solve the -ESRCH
>     problem finally.
> 
> Fix 3) Solve the fixup_pi_state_owner() problem which needs to do the fixup
>     in the lock protected section by using the in_atomic userspace access
>     functions.
> 	
>     This removes also the ugly lock drop / unqueue inside of fixup_pi_state()
> 
> Fix 4) Fix a stale lock in the error path of futex_wake_pi()
> 
> Added some error checks for verification.
> 
> The -EDEADLK problem is solved by the rtmutex fixups.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

i've read the patch and it looks all good - but obviously testing will 
tell us what's up, this stuff is ... complex.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-08  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-08  0:29 [patch 0/4] PI-Futex bugfixes and cleanups Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-08  0:29 ` [patch 1/4] rt-mutex: Fix stale return value Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-08  7:20   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-08  0:29 ` [patch 2/4] rt-mutex: Fix chain walk early wakeup bug Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-08  7:18   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-08  0:29 ` [patch 3/4] pi-futex: Fix exit races and locking problems Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-08  7:16   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-06-08  0:29 ` [patch 4/4] FUTEX: Tidy up the code Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-08  7:10   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070608071611.GB30226@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®