From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937949AbXFHPHB (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 11:07:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762719AbXFHPGw (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 11:06:52 -0400 Received: from marvin.h-e-r-e-s-y.com ([87.106.62.5]:54232 "EHLO marvin.h-e-r-e-s-y.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758448AbXFHPGw (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 11:06:52 -0400 From: Andrew Walrond To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's up with 2.6.20? Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 16:06:48 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Paul Albrecht References: <1181311065.3606.0.camel@albrecht.rdi1.com> In-Reply-To: <1181311065.3606.0.camel@albrecht.rdi1.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706081606.49074.andrew@walrond.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 08 June 2007 14:57:45 Paul Albrecht wrote: > > Seems like an obvious regression so I was wondering if I could get some > help resolving the problem here? > I see a reply from Dimitry Torokhov which you haven't acknowledged. Did you miss it? Andrew Walrond PS 'Nudge' messages like this should be in reply to your original message. People aren't going to hunt back through 450 messages to find out what you said yesterday...