mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@horizon.com
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@horizon.com, mpm@selenic.com
Cc: bgilbert@cs.cmu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: fix folding
Date: 13 Jun 2007 01:45:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070613054521.18992.qmail@science.horizon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070613052951.GI11166@waste.org>

> Folding is done to minimize the theoretical possibility of systematic
> weakness in the particular bits of the SHA1 hash output. The result of
> this bug is that 16 out of 80 bits are un-folded. Without a major new
> vulnerability being found in SHA1, this is harmless, but still worth
> fixing.

Actually, even WITH a major new vulnerability found in SHA1, it's
harmless.  Sorry to put BUG in caps earlier; it actually doesn't warrant
the sort of adjective I used.  The purpose of the folding is to ensure that
the feedback includes bits underivable from the output.  Just outputting
the first 80 bits and feeding back all 160 would achieve that effect;
the folding is of pretty infinitesimal benefit.

Note that last five rounds have as major outputs e, d, c, b, and a,
in that order.  Thus, the first words are the "most hashed" and
the ones most worth using as output... which happens naturally with
no folding.

The folding is a submicroscopic bit of additional mixing.
Frankly, the code size savings probably makes it worth deleting it.
(That would also give you more flexibility to select the output/feedback
ratio in whatever way you like.)

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-13  5:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-11  7:53 [PATCH 2/3] [CRYPTO] Add optimized SHA-1 implementation for i486+ linux
2007-06-11 19:17 ` Benjamin Gilbert
2007-06-12  5:05   ` linux
2007-06-13  5:29     ` [PATCH] random: fix folding Matt Mackall
2007-06-13  5:45       ` linux [this message]
2007-06-13  6:08         ` Matt Mackall
2007-06-13  5:50     ` [PATCH 2/3] [CRYPTO] Add optimized SHA-1 implementation for i486+ Matt Mackall
2007-06-13  6:46       ` linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070613054521.18992.qmail@science.horizon.com \
    --to=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bgilbert@cs.cmu.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®