From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755956AbXFVHMZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:12:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755407AbXFVHL7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:11:59 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:40353 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752286AbXFVHL6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:11:58 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:11:51 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Steven Rostedt Cc: LKML , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Christoph Hellwig , john stultz , Oleg Nesterov , "Paul E. McKenney" , Dipankar Sarma , "David S. Miller" , matthew.wilcox@hp.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] Split out tasklets from softirq.c Message-ID: <20070622071151.GC21291@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Steven Rostedt , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , john stultz , Oleg Nesterov , "Paul E. McKenney" , Dipankar Sarma , "David S. Miller" , matthew.wilcox@hp.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru References: <20070622040014.234651401@goodmis.org> <20070622040136.783692883@goodmis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070622040136.783692883@goodmis.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:00:16AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Tasklets are really a separate entity from softirqs, so they > deserve their own file. Also this allows us to easily replace > tasklets for something else ;-) It's a bit pointless when softirq.h still always includes it. A while ago I had a patch that split it out and made all users include it directly. But reviving this patch would be rather pointless if we just want to kill tasklets in the end anyway.