From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758635AbXGCBPq (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2007 21:15:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757354AbXGCBPi (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2007 21:15:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:37741 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756808AbXGCBPh (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2007 21:15:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 21:13:54 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Andrew Morton , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Venkatesh Pallipadi , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI Message-ID: <20070703011354.GB31035@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Venkatesh Pallipadi , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <20070701202037.GC10869@stusta.de> <20070702232255.GH6403@redhat.com> <20070702234313.GB3492@stusta.de> <20070703003648.GA31035@redhat.com> <20070703010611.GD3492@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070703010611.GD3492@stusta.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:06:11AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > @@ -65,1 +60,1 @@ > > > - depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ || X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI || X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI > > > + depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ || X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI > > > --- linux-2.6.20-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c.old 2007-02-17 23:29:53.000000000 +0100 > > > +++ linux-2.6.20-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c 2007-02-17 23:30:44.000000000 +0100 > > > > This won't apply either. > > git-apply --unidiff-zero git-apply isn't the same thing as git-applymbox. (which doesn't know that option) The former involves a lot more hassle to get the changelog & comments pasted in, along with it getting attribution correct automatically. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk