From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761363AbXGENYR (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:24:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758745AbXGENYJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:24:09 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:53499 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758663AbXGENYI (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:24:08 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Miklos Szeredi Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:31:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: pavel@ucw.cz, oliver@neukum.org, paulus@samba.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org References: <18059.10554.955290.148535@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <200707051358.26963.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707051531.37532.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, 5 July 2007 14:24, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > Don't you think, however, that it can be modified a little to play well, > > for example, with the freezer? > > I could stick a couple of try_to_freeze()s into fuse, and that would > make suspend failure less likely. But making problems less easy to > reproduce is not a good thing. So, how about eliminating them? Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth