From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760863AbXGEOBz (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:01:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757476AbXGEOBs (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:01:48 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:53720 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756674AbXGEOBs (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:01:48 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:09:24 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Oliver Neukum , Miklos Szeredi , paulus@samba.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz, benh@kernel.crashing.org References: <18059.10554.955290.148535@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <200707051528.34754.oliver@neukum.org> <20070705134632.GA22177@srcf.ucam.org> In-Reply-To: <20070705134632.GA22177@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707051609.25887.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, 5 July 2007 15:46, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 03:28:33PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > If, at a minimum, we can determine that we can STD without a freezer. > > It makes no sense to invest a lot of work to face the same problem > > again with STD. > > I have a model for STD that avoids the need to freeze the entirity of > userspace, but I need to find some more time to flesh it out. You can just describe it, as far as I'm concerned. :-) Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth