From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754169AbXGGJQY (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 05:16:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751186AbXGGJQQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 05:16:16 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:50090 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751220AbXGGJQO (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 05:16:14 -0400 Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 11:15:27 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano Cc: Rui Nuno Capela , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , RT-Users , Steven Rostedt , "jcaceres@ccrma.Stanford.EDU" , Carsten Emde Subject: Re: v2.6.21.5-rt19 Message-ID: <20070707091527.GA21234@elte.hu> References: <1183582155.3291.160.camel@chaos> <9609.194.65.103.1.1183731007.squirrel@www.rncbc.org> <1183758545.20747.34.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1183758545.20747.34.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -1.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > Althought I'm still with my fingers crossed, I can tell the good > > news are that 2.6.21.5-rt19 (and -rt20) does behave far better now > > on the very same box. > > Yes, it works much better indeed... > > Ingo: is there a place where I can read about the changes in different > rtxx releases? What is new/better/fixed in rt20? (I see scheduler > stuff in a diff from rt19 to rt20 but I don't really know what it > means). rt19 -> rt20 was a pure CFS update - from v18 to v19-almost-final. Ingo