From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755850AbXGIJgr (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2007 05:36:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751643AbXGIJgk (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2007 05:36:40 -0400 Received: from smtp-out001.kontent.com ([81.88.40.215]:41931 "EHLO smtp-out.kontent.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751578AbXGIJgk (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2007 05:36:40 -0400 From: Oliver Neukum To: Miklos Szeredi Subject: Re: malicious filesystems (was Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:36:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, pavel@ucw.cz, paulus@samba.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, nigel@nigel.suspend2.net References: <200707050858.03638.oliver@neukum.org> <200707082307.15616.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707091136.33581.oliver@neukum.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Montag, 9. Juli 2007 schrieb Miklos Szeredi: > In that case the "we need suspend to be invisible to userspace" as a > reason to use the freezer would also be moot, since if you don't > schedule userspace after offlining the CPUs, it can't notice this. After? Can you do the offlining atomically? Regards Oliver