From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762117AbXGJQq2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:46:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756085AbXGJQqE (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:46:04 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:38052 "HELO xenotime.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754576AbXGJQqB (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:46:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:49:30 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Pavel Emelianov Cc: Ashok Raj , Shaohua Li , Anil S Keshavamurthy , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: OOPS at dmar_table_init (2.6.22-rc6-mm1 kernel) Message-Id: <20070710094930.1d4be2f4.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <46939045.5070508@sw.ru> References: <46939045.5070508@sw.ru> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.2 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:57:25 +0400 Pavel Emelianov wrote: > Hi. > > While working with Andrew's kernel I faced an OOPS on x86_64 > machine. Unfortunately kernel logs are not appearing in serial > console by the time oops happens, but I have some info on the > screen: > > OOPs is at dmar_table_init() here: > ffffffff80532873 : > ffffffff80532873: 41 55 push %r13 > ffffffff80532875: 41 54 push %r12 > ffffffff80532877: 55 push %rbp > ffffffff80532878: 53 push %rbx > ffffffff80532879: 51 push %rcx > ffffffff8053287a: 4c 8b 2d 07 21 01 00 mov 73991(%rip),%r13 # ffffffff80544988 > ffffffff80532881: 41 0f b6 45 24 movzbl 0x24(%r13),%eax <<<<<<<<<<< OOPS, %r13 = NULL > ffffffff80532886: 84 c0 test %al,%al > ffffffff80532888: 75 11 jne ffffffff8053289b > ffffffff8053288a: 48 c7 c7 b0 3d 45 80 mov $0xffffffff80453db0,%rdi > ffffffff80532891: e8 c2 4a cf ff callq ffffffff80227358 > ffffffff80532896: e9 f2 01 00 00 jmpq ffffffff80532a8d > > Looks like dmar_tbl is NULL. > BUG is 100% reproducible. Is there any other info that can be useful? You could test the patch from http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/29/174 (see "Get diff 1"). --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***