From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762478AbXGKLGj (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:06:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757811AbXGKLGc (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:06:32 -0400 Received: from tamriel.snowman.net ([72.66.115.51]:49850 "EHLO tamriel.snowman.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755641AbXGKLGb (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:06:31 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 638 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:06:31 EDT Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:55:52 -0400 From: Stephen Frost To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Stefano Rivoir , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.22 released Message-ID: <20070711105552.GG4887@tamriel.snowman.net> Mail-Followup-To: Linus Torvalds , Stefano Rivoir , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <4693327E.6000006@gts.it> <46947ADF.4080605@gts.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/aHqdxxe3Vo3WJ36" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ X-Info: http://www.snowman.net X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.21-2-amd64 (x86_64) X-Uptime: 06:43:03 up 9 days, 20:08, 20 users, load average: 0.02, 0.17, 0.25 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --/aHqdxxe3Vo3WJ36 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Linus Torvalds (torvalds@linux-foundation.org) wrote: > I'm hoping your Debian/sid gcc version is some very experimental=20 > known-buggy one, and not something that people _expect_ to be solid and= =20 > work well? No such luck. :( Debian's close to moving to gcc-4.2 as the default compiler in sid. We've rebuilt the archive a number of times (both since the 4.2 release and during its development) using gcc-4.2 and thought we'd identified most of the issues with it. It clearly sounds like we need to open a high-severity bug on this issue and track it down before we move to it as the default compiler. I'll start harassing the appropriate folks also. Stefano, can you file that bug, including the config, dmesg, and backtrace from gcc if you can get it? Thanks, Stephen --/aHqdxxe3Vo3WJ36 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGlLc4rzgMPqB3kigRAgsPAJ9TdhUmEw5qJ+epEiV/YU2Zu9yDfACfV8ji GH6PjNnpUyPeic54gQuaamM= =Y43K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/aHqdxxe3Vo3WJ36--