From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764819AbXGLMKb (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:10:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764862AbXGLMIu (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:08:50 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:37760 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932648AbXGLMIr (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:08:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:07:38 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Gregory Haskins Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, jim.houston@ccur.com, joe.korty@ccur.com, dwalker@mvista.com, David Bahi , Moiz Kohari , Sven Dietrich , dsaxena@plexity.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , Clark Williams , Alessio Igor Bogani Subject: Re: Forward port of latest RT patch (2.6.21.5-rt20) to 2.6.22 available Message-ID: <20070712120738.GA9985@elte.hu> References: <469544710200005A000275CC@mcclure.wal.novell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <469544710200005A000275CC@mcclure.wal.novell.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7-deb -1.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Gregory Haskins wrote: > Hi Ingo, Thomas, and the greater linux-rt community, > > I just wanted to let you guys know that our team has a port of > the 21.5-rt20 patch for the 2.6.22 kernel available. [...] great! We had the upstream -rt port to .22 in the works too, it was just held up by the hpet breakage - which Thomas managed to fix earlier today. I've released the 2.6.22.1-rt1 patch to the usual place: http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/ I took a quick look at the delta between .22.1-rt1 and your rt1 merge, and the delta patch is quite large and i saw no obvious fixes to pick up. Could you please filter out any fixes that you might have in your tree that you think should be applied, and send it to us as a delta against .22.1-rt1? Alessio, could you please also do the same and check for any diffs that should be applied? Thanks! (And, as Daniel suggested, in the future, could you _please_ use a different naming scheme instead of using up the upstream -rt namespace.) Ingo